Perceived shortcomings of P25

P25 has had its share of criticism, much of which was misplaced, unfair or is no longer valid. For example, some early large systems did not have enough radio sites and the resulting coverage problems – though technology independent – were unfairly attributed to P25.

This list represents criticism that is at least partially justified.

  • Despite significant progress and increasing competition, cost is still perceived as the biggest problem.
  • Voice quality is perceived as a problem by some users.
  • Low tolerance for interference and multipath when compared against analog.
  • Limited data transmission capability (9.6Kbps).
  • Full compliance and interoperability are possible, but require careful planning.
  • Not all subsets of the standards are finalized or commercially implemented, as the standard is still evolving.
  • The sharp drop-off in voice quality with weak RF signal is an issue, in particular for on-scene Fire communications.
  • No support for paging.
  • Audio delay compared with analog.

Click "NEXT" to learn about Technology Selection or select a topic from the menu below.

Specifying your P25 System: Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tait Communications

Cookies

This site uses both functional cookies and tracking cookies to help us understand how users interact with the site.

You can choose to disable non-functional cookies if you wish, however we will need to set a functional cookie to respect your choice.

If you do not wish to accept any cookies, you will not be able to continue using this website.

Analytics and tracking

We use trusted third-party analytics providers to help us improve your experience on this website.

Privacy Policy
Privacy settings