Simulcast, multicast or hybrid?

Simulcast Multicast
One channel at each of the simulcasting sites transmits the same signal simultaneously at the same frequency One channel at each of the participating sites transmits the same signal simultaneously at different frequency
Requires high level of signal control in any overlap area No comparable requirement
Ease of roaming Roaming manual or requiring advanced technology
Requires complex system failure scenarios planning No comparable requirement
Frequency efficient Frequency consuming
Requires identical number of repeaters at each site, even where traffic loading is low Equipment (repeater) efficient, allows different number of repeaters at each site
Requires voting Conventional multicast may require voting, trunked multicast does not

Each approach has distinct advantages and disadvantages, but, in practice, in majority of Public Safety applications, the advantages of simulcast (ease of use and spectrum efficiency) will outweigh its disadvantages (typically higher costs and higher maintenance requirements). A complete and comprehensive analysis of pros and cons of simulcast vs. multicast is complex, and the outcome will depend on your particular circumstances.

It is possible and indeed common to combine simulcast and multicast into a hybrid architecture. This is most advantageous where the system needs to cover both high density urban areas with a large number of users and high number of channels, as well as larger areas with low density and subsequent limited need for channels.

Network capacity engineering is relatively simple for single site systems or for pure simulcast systems, where one frequency pair = one channel. But quickly becomes very complex for multicast or hybrid systems. Your capacity needs will determine the number and location of repeaters. While network capacity engineering can be complex, you can start by applying this simple rule of thumb: about 70 users per working channel.

Keep in mind that in a trunked P25 system, one channel per site acts as a control channel so is unavailable for voice traffic.

Click "NEXT" to learn about Sizing your network for major events or select a topic from the menu below.

Specifying your P25 System: Articles

One response to “Simulcast, multicast or hybrid?”

  1. […] from multiple towers? Seems to handle it a lot better, wouldn't you say? Some links for thought: Simulcast, multicast or hybrid Solutions | P25 Best Practice Perceived shortcomings of P25 | P25 Best […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tait Communications

Cookies

This site uses both functional cookies and tracking cookies to help us understand how users interact with the site.

You can choose to disable non-functional cookies if you wish, however we will need to set a functional cookie to respect your choice.

If you do not wish to accept any cookies, you will not be able to continue using this website.

Analytics and tracking

We use trusted third-party analytics providers to help us improve your experience on this website.

Privacy Policy
Privacy settings